عنوان مقاله [English]
Undoubtedly, the statement of the second step of the Islamic Revolution is a reflection of the intellectual system of the greatest revolution of the century, and its analysis and explanation requires various approaches.
The use of structuralist linguistic ideas, especially binary oppositions, to analyze the structure of meaning formation can be one of these approaches; Explain that the explanation and analysis of texts in order to approach complex interpretations of language and thought has always been of interest to thinkers and researchers.
In structuralism, the deep principles of the structure of binary oppositions are very important (Selden, 1996: p. 14). Discovering the binary oppositions of a text is one of the general readings and strategies of text interpretation and one of the main methods of navigating the text and meaning with the aim of analyzing and explaining the structural factors affecting discourse because text units are based on their interrelationships with identity.
The purpose of this study is to explain the statement of the second step of the Islamic Revolution from the perspective of binary oppositions with descriptive-analytical and comparative methods. Although in the introduction the origin and evolution of this theory is discussed, but in this article we try to explore the binary oppositions of ideas. The axis of the revolution in the second step statement should be done with the aim of explanation and interpretation. Finding these contrasts, in addition to helping to understand the speaker's main purpose, acquaints the reader with a different interpretation of the discourse governing the statement.
As a result, in addition to obtaining the meaning of some concepts due to their opposite poles, by extracting the network, the positive and negative alignment of the semantic chains and the governing structure in the statement are analyzed.