Critique of the issue of the condition of universality in determining the leader of the Islamic Revolution with emphasis on the critique of Ayatollah Montazeri

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD Student, Department of Political Science, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran

2 teacherFaculty member of Political Science Department, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran

3 Faculty member of Political Science Department, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran

Abstract

The purpose of writing at present is to examine and critique the issue of the participation of the Supreme Leader in the election of the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution, emphasizing the critique of Ayatollah Montazeri's view, which is applied in the library method - documents are made to do so. According to jurisprudential arguments, the guardianship and rule over the Islamic society during the absence is comprehensive against the poor. On the one hand, the province is general and includes all aspects of government affairs. On the other hand, due to the breadth and diversity of the country's affairs, Vali-e-Faqih alone was able to budget in all pillars of Islamic society, which directly plays a role and personally manages all matters related to the government. For this reason, the constitution of the Islamic Republic stipulates that poverty must delegate some of its duties and responsibilities to children or other groups. One of the conditions of Velayat-e-Faqih, which is regulated in the constitution and later revised, is the condition of the velayat-e-Faqih. This condition was criticized by jurists, including Ayatollah Montazeri. Imam Khomeini is one of the jurists who has explicitly denied the condition of universality in the Supreme Leader. Imam has done: "If a person is knowledgeable in the mining sciences of the seminaries, but it is not possible to distinguish the expedient community or could not distinguish righteous and useful people from unrighteous people, in general in the social and political field and decision-making power would have existed. "This person does not have ijtihad in social and governmental issues and cannot take over the affairs of society."

Keywords

Main Subjects

Islamic Revolution Research
Volume 12, Issue 3 - Serial Number 46
November 2023
Pages 265-295

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics