Investigating the historical development of the discourse of war in the Islamic Revolution based on Norman Fairclough's model.

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

ARAK UNIVERCITY

Abstract
Among the important concepts in the political and social literature of societies is the concept of war. Re-reading the key opinions that influence the general policies of the society can lead to a more complete definition of the desired phenomenon and explain the political and social outlook of the societies more accurately. In this article, by dealing with the concept of war in the discourse of the revolution with a descriptive analytical method and based on Farklough's three-level model, it was determined that the occurrence of the Islamic Revolution led to the redefinition of new conceptual and value structures and changed some semantic fields in the global relations of power. gave The centrality of the new system and structure that was established in Iran is the formation of a religious government. This caused fundamental changes, including the emergence of an ideological competitor at the level of global power relations. With the emergence of such conditions, socio-political systems and power structures are redefined and take on a new form. In order to maintain the status quo and consolidate power, the existing powers that do not accept the new discourse rise up against it and in this way try various forms of exercising power. In this course, the historical development of the method of conflict and confrontation in the power structure leads from hard and military war to cultural invasion, cultural bloodshed, cultural looting, cultural massacre, cultural NATO, cultural soft war, which at the present time is faced with a variety of methods of exercising power. which ultimately leads to a combined war method. Alienation, hostility and authority are among the central signs of the discourse of war, and the concepts of defense, jihad, struggle, insight and resistance are the concepts involved in completing this discourse network.

Keywords

Subjects

Agha Golzadeh, Ferdows. (2006). Critical Discourse Analysis, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural, First Edition.
Palmer, Frank. (2012). A New Look at Semantics, Translated by Kourosh Safavi, Tehran: Markaz Publishing House.
Hossein Sharifi, Ahmad. (2011). Soft War, Qom: Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute.
Khomeini, Ruhollah. (2006). Imam's Journal, Tehran: Institute for the Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini's Works.
Ranjbaran, Davud. (2009). Soft War, Tehran: Salhal Andisheh.
Safavi, Kourosh. (2011). An Introduction to Semantics, Tehran: Sureh Mehr, Fourth Edition.
Safavi, Kourosh. (2012). Introduction to Semantics, Tehran: Pajhwok Kayvan, Second Edition.
Kobley, Paul. (2008). Theories of Communication, Translated by Ehsan Shah Ghasemi, Tehran: Institute for the Research of Humanities and Cultural Studies.
Fairclough, Norman. (1990). Critical Discourse Analysis, Translators' Group. Tehran: Media Studies Center.
Naini, Ali Mohammad. (1992). Principles and Rules of Soft Warfare, Tehran: Saqi.
Yar Mohammadi, Lotfollah. (2004). Common and Critical Discourse, Tehran: Hermes.
Fairclough, Norman (2001). Language and Power, London: Longman, second edition.
Saeed, John (2013). Semantics, Wiley-Blackwell Publishers.
https://farsi.khamenei.ir/newspart-index?tid=1016