Political Ontology and Civilizational Future-Making: The Discourse Approach of the Islamic Revolution

Nazeri, Masoud; Keshavarz Turk, Einollah

Political Ontology and Civilizational Future-Making: The Discourse Approach of the Islamic Revolution

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Masoud Nazeri ¹

Einollah Keshavarz turk ²

¹ Postdoctoral Researcher, Department of Futures Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

² Associate Professor, Department of Futures Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

Abstract

This study elucidates the role of political ontology in civilizational future-making from the perspective of the Islamic Revolution discourse, offering an integrative framework for realizing the future-making act in contemporary political philosophy. The theoretical structure rests on three levels: discourse, ontology, and future-making. First, applying Laclau and Mouffe’s analysis to foundational texts including Imam Khomeini, Ayatollah Khamenei, and the Second Phase Statement, “Pure Muhammadan Islam” is identified as the central signifier and meaning-making nodal point. Through chains of equivalence, this discourse redefines concepts such as humanity, justice, independence, and Progress within a Divine horizon against rival discourses. Second, utilizing Marchart’s political ontology, the political is explicated as the sphere of collective self-awareness; a realm where political action is not merely power competition but disclosing collective existence and the Ummah, marking a transition from revolutionary thinking to revolutionary being. Third, drawing on Miller and Poli’s normative futures approach, civilizational future-making is conceptualized as realizing Divine Will within human agency. The final outcome is a three-level model that, by linking Meaning, Being, and Future, provides a theoretical foundation for establishing the New Islamic Civilization.

Keywords

Pure Islam

Future-Making

Civilization

Islamic Revolution

Discourse Political Ontology

Subjects

Theoretical foundations of the Islamic Revolution

Holy Quran
Nahj al-Balagha
Imam Khomeini. (1300-1368), Imam's Sahifah. Volume 1-21. https://emam.com/
Imam Khomeini. (1368), Imam's Divine-Political Testament. http://www.imam-khomeini.ir/
Ayatollah Khamenei. (1390-1404), His Statements and the Declaration of the Second Step of the Islamic Revolution. https://farsi.khamenei.ir/
Bagheri, Kazem. (1388), Ontology of Political Philosophy in Transcendental Wisdom. Qabsat Quarterly, 14(51), 105-138.
Behrouzi Lak, Gholam Reza and Kafili, Reza. (1403), Discourse-Making Model in Ayatollah Khamenei's Political Thought. Political Sciences, 27(2), 64-108. Doi: 10.22081/psq.2024.68225.2861
Taghiloo, Faramarz. (2017), From Political Science to Politics: Ontology of the Relation between Politics and the Political. Theoretical Politics Research, 12(22), 29-52.
Tavakoli-Mohammadi, Morteza. (2017), The Discourse of the Islamic Revolution and the Revolutionary Seminary from the Perspective of the Supreme Leader. Transcendental Politics, 5(17), 117-136.
Hejazi, Seyyed Nasrallah and Bahrami, Vahid. (2019), Application of Laclau and Mouffe's Discourse Analysis Method in Political Science. Methodology of Humanities, 25(99), 1-18. Doi: 10.30471/mssh.2019.1575
Dara, Jalil and Karami, Mustafa. (2013), Freethinking in the Discourse of the Islamic Revolution. Journal of Islamic Revolution Research, 3(6), 120-91.
Rezagholi, Amir. (2014), An Introduction to the Necessity of Islamic Futures Studies and Attention to Its Levels with a Focus on Nahj al-Balagha. Strategic Futures Studies Quarterly, 3(11), 129-150. Doi: 20.1001.1.28212592.1403.3.11.6.2
Rahbari, Mehdi. (2007). The Formation of Revolutionary Discourse in Iran. Public Law Research, 9(23), 89-144.
Sagha, Fereshteh, Fattahizadeh, Fathiyeh and Shafiei Sarvestani, Ebrahim. (2015), The role of human will in realizing the promised future from the perspective of the Quran. Religious Anthropology, 11(32), 49-68.
Shirafkan, Mojtaba, Ashrafi, Akbar and Shirazi, Habibollah. (2014), The foundations of the discourse of the Islamic Revolution from the perspective of Imam Khomeini (RA). Political Discourse of the Islamic Revolution, 3(2), 45-66. Doi:10.71723/dir.2024.1067992
Shirvani-Naghani, Muslim, Kolivand, Khalil, Ejabi, Ebrahim and Mohammad-Beigi, Fatemeh. (2013), A representation of studies in the field of futures studies in Iranian scientific journals from 2008 to 2022. Iranian Futures Studies, 8(2), 1-30. Doi:10.30479/JFS.2023.18178.1452
Sadeghi, Abdullah and Wasiti, Abdulhamid. (2010), The Effect of Ontological Basis in the Production of Religious Anthropology Theory. Journal of Theology, 7(12), 225-245. Doi:10.22034/pke.2020.4918
Kesraei, Mohammadsalar and Pozhesh-Shirazi, Ali. (2010), Laclay and Mouffe's Discourse Theory as an Effective Tool in Understanding and Explaining Political Phenomena. Journal of Politics, 39(3), 339-360.
Lakzai, Najaf, Elhami, Ali, and Lakzai, Reza. (2010), The Role of Power in the Establishment of Modern Islamic Civilization in the Thought of Imam Khomeini. Journal of Fundamental Studies of Modern Islamic Civilization, 3(1), 29-58. Doi: 10.22070/nic.2021.14006.1075
Nabatian, Mohammad Ismail.(1403), Islamic Revolution Discourse; Foundations and Components. Islamic Revolution Discourse, 1(2), 17-25.
Nabatian, Mohammad Ismail.(1400), Islamic Revolution Discourse and Facing the Challenge of Alternativeization. Islamic Awakening Studies Quarterly, 10(1), 7-29.
Agamben, G. (2016). The Use of Bodies. Stanford University Press.
Bahrampour, M. and Nazari, A. A. (2025). Ontological dimensions of post-foundational political thought and Reinvention of the Political. Islamic Political Thought, 12(1), 1-31. Doi: 10.30497/ipt.2025.247591.1033
Bell, W. (1997). Foundations of future studies: Human science for a new era, Volume 1: History, purposes, and knowledge. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Blaser, M. (2013a). Ontological conflicts and the stories of peoples in spite of Europe: Toward a conversation on political ontology. Current Anthropology, 54(5), 547–568. https://doi.org/10.1086/672270
Chen, Jiaoyan, Mashkova, Olga, Zhapa-Camacho, Fernando, Hoehndorf, Robert and He, Yuan and Horrocks, Ian. (2025). Ontology Embedding: A Survey of Methods, Applications and Resources. arXiv e-prints. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2406.10964
Chipato, F., & Chandler, D. (2023). After the end of the world? Rethinking temporalities of critique and affirmation in the Anthropocene. International Relations, 39(3), 343-364. https://doi.org/10.1177/00471178231194710
Daly A. (2022). Ontology and Politics: Interdependence and Radical Contingency in Merleau-Ponty's Political Interworld. Hum Stud. 45(2):341-359. Doi:10.1007/s10746-022-09628-4
Ehrnström-Fuentes M, Böhm S. (2023), The Political Ontology of Corporate Social Responsibility: Obscuring the Pluriverse in Place. J Bus Ethics.185(2):245-261. Doi:10.1007/s10551-022-05175-1
Fusco, G.-G. (2023). Form of Life: Agamben and the Destitution of Rules. Edinburgh University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctv32vqh1j
Goldman, L. (2024). Experimentation and the future(s) of political hope. European Journal of Social Theory, 27(2), 314-331. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310241229653
Inayatullah, S. (1998). Causal layered analysis: poststructuralism as method, Vol.30(8), pp.815-829. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(98)00086-X
Inayatullah, S. (2004), The Causal Layered Analysis (CLA) Reader Theory and Case Studies of an Integrative and Transformative Methodology, Tamkang University.
Inayatullah, Sohail. (2013). Future Studies. Theories and Methods. There's a future. Visions for a Better World. 36-66. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281595208
Joronen, M., & Häkli, J. (2016). Politicizing ontology. Progress in Human Geography, 41(5), 561-579. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516652