The importance of opinion in the thought and practice of jurists in different periods, from the beginning of the era of the disappearance of the cobra to the Qajar period, shows the ups and downs and movement in an evolutionary path. After the Safavid dynasty came to power and the transition from the era of Taqiyyah, we witness the cooperation of the jurists with the Safavid government and the acceptance of Safavid government positions in the form of the jurists' shari'a guardianship and the Muslim monarchy of Dhu Shaukat. The fall of the Safavid dynasty and the coming to power of the Afghans, Nader Shah and Zandiye caused the collapse of the political and religious relations of the Safavid era, and political positions were taken from the jurists, and in the context of the society, three religious currents, Usuli, Khabari and Sufi, competed and clashed; But the outcome of this political and socio-religious conflict at the end of the period of intercession and the beginning of the Qajar era is the promotion of the status of jurists and the acquisition of independent social authority, which did not derive its power from the appointment of sultans, who obtained it from the people, and the kings needed their permission. . Now the question arises, why and how did the jurists change from cooperating with the government and the power attributed to the sultan to relying on the people and social authority? Using Skinner's theory of intentional hermeneutics and analysis of environmental conditions and discourse and religious contexts, this hypothesis has been proven that the developments in Shia jurisprudence, especially the topics of ijtihad, taqlid and khums on the one hand, and environmental changes and the occurrence of social conditions on the other hand, In a hundred-year process, ...